tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18037024.post5895554501526021632..comments2024-02-16T14:33:11.277+01:00Comments on Annals of Oracle's Improbable Errors: Off topic: Routers, VPN gateways, MTU, chili peppers and the unbearable lightness of buyer's commentsByte64http://www.blogger.com/profile/15629209362377395020noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18037024.post-13130850628174220982007-05-27T23:46:00.000+02:002007-05-27T23:46:00.000+02:00Thanks for the technical insight.I read somewhere ...Thanks for the technical insight.<BR/>I read somewhere about the 28 bytes overhead but i felt not strong enough in the networking domain to make any statements about this.<BR/>So, i preferred to keep a <I>low profile on this</I>... :-DByte64https://www.blogger.com/profile/15629209362377395020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18037024.post-13942595849793253992007-05-27T09:50:00.000+02:002007-05-27T09:50:00.000+02:00FYI 1432 MTU + TCP overhead (28) = 1460, the opti...FYI 1432 MTU + TCP overhead (28) = 1460, the optimum size MTU for PPPoA.<BR/><BR/>1492 is the optimum size MTU for PPPoE<BR/><BR/>Just letting you know where your modem/router got the number.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01458901627112800082noreply@blogger.com